I'm not going to pretend to be up on vintage ratings for Michigan, but my understanding is 2007 was considered exceptional and 2008 was merely average (in fact, there was some, shall we say, bitching about how the Old Mission fellas probably couldn't make a great '08 CF). Let's unscrew a bottle and try an '08, shall we? The winery normally sells for $25, but is on sale for $20 - not sure how long that deal will last.
Rich, black raspberry with a chocolaty - almost carob like - nose.
The first word that comes to mind is tart. Served blind, I probably would've guessed Italy. Loads of acid and not a lot of tannin - the sorta wine you can crack open immediately and serve with just about anything that has red sauce on it and it will go perfectly. There's a very interesting cherry thing going on - it's almost like a dry cherry soda (there's a new line of "dry" sodas on the market, I haven't dried them but I'm guessing it has this sort of quality).
Tart cherry, not to bring up the soda/candy thing, but it almost has a CherryHead quality, but by no means is it sweet, nor is it artificial tasting.
--
I let half this bottle sit overnight. Notes from day two differed enough that this warrants another set of notes -
The nose is like half Coke, half root beer with a dash of cherry syrup.
On day one, I liked this wine. On day two, I loved it. Most the "tart" quality has faded leaving a clear cherry cola component. In fact, I would say cherry cola dominates both the palate and finish and for that I tip my hat. You know, it's almost like regular ol' Coke with a shot of cherry vodka.
If you like tart, Chianti style wines, open a bottle and pour. If you like cola notes, almost Burgundian qualities, pour one glass, drink it, recap and put the bottle in the fridge for a day or two, and you're all good.
Wine: Day 1 - 8. Day 2 - 9
Value: Yep
I haven't had a chance to try the 2008 yet. We are going to Traverse CIty in a couple of weeks, so I am excited to try it then.
ReplyDeleteWhat's interesting is at the tasting room I thought the 2007 was far better, but now I'm not so sure - they're startlingly different either way.
ReplyDelete